{"id":578,"date":"2016-10-07T13:47:13","date_gmt":"2016-10-07T12:47:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/?p=578"},"modified":"2016-10-07T13:47:13","modified_gmt":"2016-10-07T12:47:13","slug":"jurisprudencia-formula-executoria-no-requerimento-de-injuncao","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/2016\/10\/07\/jurisprudencia-formula-executoria-no-requerimento-de-injuncao\/","title":{"rendered":"Jurisprud\u00eancia: f\u00f3rmula execut\u00f3ria no requerimento de injun\u00e7\u00e3o"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\">f\u00f3rmula execut\u00f3ria no requerimento de injun\u00e7\u00e3o e justo impedimento<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">177746\/14.0YIPRT-A.L1-2 do TRLisboa de 09\/22\/2016<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I. Ap\u00f3s ter sido aposta f\u00f3rmula execut\u00f3ria no requerimento de injun\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o pode ser admitida oposi\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 injun\u00e7\u00e3o, ainda que com invoca\u00e7\u00e3o de justo impedimento da sua dedu\u00e7\u00e3o no prazo legal.<br \/>\nII. No caso previsto em I o justo impedimento dever\u00e1 ser declarado, com celeridade, perante o BNI, e apreciado pelo juiz de instru\u00e7\u00e3o em sede de oposi\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 execu\u00e7\u00e3o (art.\u00ba 857.\u00ba n.\u00ba 2 do CPC).<\/p>\n<h6>http:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrl.nsf\/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec\/715bcddb716a3e2a802580440039ffef?OpenDocument<\/h6>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>f\u00f3rmula execut\u00f3ria no requerimento de injun\u00e7\u00e3o e justo impedimento 177746\/14.0YIPRT-A.L1-2 do TRLisboa de 09\/22\/2016 I. Ap\u00f3s ter sido aposta f\u00f3rmula execut\u00f3ria no requerimento de injun\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o pode ser admitida oposi\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 injun\u00e7\u00e3o, ainda que com invoca\u00e7\u00e3o de justo impedimento da sua dedu\u00e7\u00e3o no prazo legal. II. No caso previsto em I o justo impedimento dever\u00e1&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":661,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[12,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-direito-civil","category-jurisprudencia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=578"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}