{"id":2848,"date":"2024-11-25T00:56:27","date_gmt":"2024-11-25T00:56:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/?p=2848"},"modified":"2024-11-25T00:56:27","modified_gmt":"2024-11-25T00:56:27","slug":"novo-artigo-juridico-contraordenacoes-laborais","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/2024\/11\/25\/novo-artigo-juridico-contraordenacoes-laborais\/","title":{"rendered":"Novo Artigo Jur\u00eddico: Contraordena\u00e7\u00f5es laborais"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"723\" height=\"276\" src=\"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/5606939011213-723x1024-1-e1732496945827.jpg\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/5606939011213-723x1024-1-e1732496945827.jpg 723w, https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/5606939011213-723x1024-1-e1732496945827-300x115.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Foi recentemente publicado o artigo jur\u00eddico \u00abBreves notas sobre as Contraordena\u00e7\u00f5es Laborais: o regime processual, o direito de defesa, a ilicitude (falta de consci\u00eancia e erro), e o c\u00famulo material\u00bb, da autoria de Miguel Pimenta de Almeida, no Ebook Revista Ex Libris n.\u00ba 7 \u2013 2024<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(Os entendimentos e opini\u00f5es no presente artigo s\u00e3o da exclusiva responsabilidade do autor e n\u00e3o vincula nenhum organismo)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sum\u00e1rio: 1. As contraordena\u00e7\u00f5es laborais; 2. O regime processual das contraordena\u00e7\u00f5es laborais; 3. Direito de defesa; 3.1. O auto de not\u00edcia; 3.2. A notifica\u00e7\u00e3o e a defesa do arguido e do respons\u00e1vel solid\u00e1rio; 3.3. O artigo 50.\u00ba do RGCO e o Assento n.\u00ba 1\/2003 do STJ; 4. A ilicitude (falta de consci\u00eancia e erro) do infrator laboral; 5. O c\u00famulo jur\u00eddico <em>versus<\/em> c\u00famulo material; 5.1. Aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da lei processual no tempo.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>ERRATA:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Onde se l\u00ea:<\/strong> &#8220;Contudo, no \u00e2mbito das prerrogativas do Inspetor do Trabalho, tamb\u00e9m prev\u00ea o levantamento do auto de advert\u00eancia (&#8230;)\u00a0 o qual tamb\u00e9m d\u00e1 in\u00edcio ao processo de contraordena\u00e7\u00e3o&#8221;.<br \/><strong>Deve ler-se: <\/strong>&#8220;Contudo, no \u00e2mbito das prerrogativas do Inspetor do Trabalho, tamb\u00e9m prev\u00ea o levantamento do auto de advert\u00eancia (&#8230;) contudo n\u00e3o d\u00e1 in\u00edcio ao processo de contraordena\u00e7\u00e3o&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/ebooks.aafdl.pt\/produto\/ebook-revista-ex-libris-n-o-7-2024\/\"><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" viewBox=\"0 0 512 512\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\"><path d=\"M352 96c0-53.02-42.98-96-96-96s-96 42.98-96 96 42.98 96 96 96 96-42.98 96-96zM233.59 241.1c-59.33-36.32-155.43-46.3-203.79-49.05C13.55 191.13 0 203.51 0 219.14v222.8c0 14.33 11.59 26.28 26.49 27.05 43.66 2.29 131.99 10.68 193.04 41.43 9.37 4.72 20.48-1.71 20.48-11.87V252.56c-.01-4.67-2.32-8.95-6.42-11.46zm248.61-49.05c-48.35 2.74-144.46 12.73-203.78 49.05-4.1 2.51-6.41 6.96-6.41 11.63v245.79c0 10.19 11.14 16.63 20.54 11.9 61.04-30.72 149.32-39.11 192.97-41.4 14.9-.78 26.49-12.73 26.49-27.06V219.14c-.01-15.63-13.56-28.01-29.81-27.09z\"><\/path><\/svg><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAcesso gratuito<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Foi recentemente publicado o artigo jur\u00eddico \u00abBreves notas sobre as Contraordena\u00e7\u00f5es Laborais: o regime processual, o direito de defesa, a ilicitude (falta de consci\u00eancia e erro), e o c\u00famulo material\u00bb, da autoria de Miguel Pimenta de Almeida, no Ebook Revista Ex Libris n.\u00ba 7 \u2013 2024 (Os entendimentos e opini\u00f5es no presente artigo s\u00e3o da&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2982,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2848","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-artigos-juridicos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2848","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2848"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2848\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2982"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2848"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2848"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miguelpimentadealmeida.pt\/artigos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}